Hi Sdkrachit - thank you for your response. I understand you wanting to defend K, and astonishingly he has many defenders all around the world. I’ve studied K very carefully, and my dedicated interest is objective metaphysics & how best to resolve the predicament of the human condition (I’ve written extensively on this from an objective, non-doctrinal point of view) and I can say without the least doubt that K is a complete windbag and a master of the word salad: nothing he says makes the least sense from any rational angle, and is completely incoherent: it’s all just semi-mystical blather, and only appeals if you’re prepared to accept any kind of nonsense as ‘meaningful spirituality’. I’ve given chapter & verse on this, with very specific examples. But if it works for you, then wonderful.